>Double-Strength: Videos and Links in Celebration of Barbara Hammer

>

“I have chosen images rather than words for the act of naming myself an artist and a lesbian because the level of meanings possible for images and image conjunctions seemed richer and held more ramifications” Barbara Hammer

Film Studies For Free today presents a tribute to the remarkable American, experimental filmmaker and activist Barbara Hammer. The tribute takes the form of a listing of online videos and scholarly links to studies of Hammer’s work, as well as of related queer film and politics.

Hammer is seventy-one years old, still making films and still protesting against injustice and censorship. In 2010, she published her wonderful autobiography, HAMMER! Making Movies Out of Sex and Life, which addressed her personal history and philosophies on art (see a review here).

FSFF says, “Thank you, but… keep it up, please, Barbara! Your work and activism is needed now more than ever.” (This blog can be a rather greedy and merciless task-mistress at times…)



    >Screening 9/11 and its aftermath in film and media studies

    >

    Image from In America (Jim Sheridan, 2002), the first film to be (partly) shot in New York after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to Seán Crosson’s article “‘They can’t wipe us out, they can’t lick us. We’ll go on forever pa, ‘cause we’re the people’…” (2008)

    The absence of the Twin Towers from the post-9/11 New York City skyline posed a number of dilemmas for the creators and producers of television shows and movies that were ‘symbolically’ set in New York City after 9/11. Whilst the World Trade Center towers had been destroyed, editors in studio lots in California faced the prospect of the late 2001 ratings season commencing with stock reels of New York City that prominently featured the Towers prior to 9/11. This posed an odd dilemma for the producers of television shows such as Friends, Sex and the City, and Spin City, programs in which the Twin Towers often appeared as a backdrop and a powerful signifier of being in New York City. The response seemed universal – the Twin Towers must be removed from the tele-visual pop-cultural locations. They needed to be purged, exorcised and air- brushed out of the shot. But by airbrushing out the Towers, the producers have purged post-9/11 television of more than just the steel and concrete of the iconic buildings. I suggest that this purging is powerful, a little odd, and deeply symbolic. In order to recover, perhaps some space – and some forgetting, if only temporary – was needed. But I argue that the missing Towers also represented a missing terror, a missing city. It was as though the creators and producers of some post-9/11 television believed that the world’s viewers would have no stomach for seeing images of a pre-9/11 New York City – a city that in many respects no longer existed. Perhaps the problem lies in how the destruction of the Twin Towers was witnessed – live on TV, in real-time, as heinous, immediate and real violence. It was ugly, sickening, horrific, terrifying. Yet it was also difficult to look away. [Luke John Howie, ‘Representing Terrorism: Reanimating Post-9/11 New York City’, International Journal of Žižek Studies, Vol 3, No 3 (2009)]

    It is the eve of another anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in America.

    Film Studies For Free respectfully remembers the tragic and traumatic events of nine years ago tomorrow, and other closely related ones since, with a list of links to important, insightful, and openly accessible studies of the cultural depiction and (re)media(tiza)tion of the 9/11 attacks, as well as of their aftermath.

    >Immaturity Abides! On Teen, "Gross Out" and Dumbass Comedy

    >

    Jonah Hill and Michael Cera in Superbad (Greg Mottola, 2007)

    Film Studies For Free is two years old today. You go, blog!

    In honour of its tentative entry into digital post-toddlerdom (and hopefully not the terrible twos), it wanted to celebrate online and openly accessible studies of what FSFF likes to think of (in its über-scholarly way) as those liminal film genres and cycles of comic immaturity, awkwardness, stupidity, and tastelessness — that is to say, all varieties of the teen (or arrested development) comedy (including the “teen sex comedy”, the “gross-out” comedy, comic “dude flicks” and “bromances“), as well as studies of related issues.

    Today’s scattershot links list is partly an offshoot of FSFF‘s recent entry on the romantic comedy, and partly its first experiment in “crowdsourcing” via its blossoming Facebook page. Thanks so much to those who suggested items there.

    If anyone else has any bright ideas for further additions, do please ‘fess up. FSFF earnestly promises that you won’t be ritually humiliated, or mercilessly laughed at, at all  :o)

                          http://books.google.com/books?id=KibNrpXbsDcC&lpg=PA255&ots=Ijc_1t_PQo&dq=celestino%20deleyto%20tamar%20jeffers%20mcdonald&pg=PA255&output=embed

                          http://books.google.com/books?id=kyvYBZgcmkQC&lpg=PA1996&ots=ahGKRqF6XT&dq=%22teen%20sex%20comedy%22&lr&pg=PA1996&output=embed

                          http://books.google.com/books?id=_2ZXBaDJ6DUC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA71&output=embed

                          >Good Fella: Martin Scorsese Studies

                          >

                          Updated August 19, 2010
                          Ray Liotta as Henry Hill in Goodfellas (Martin Scorsese, 1990)

                          http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=7760042583563448755&hl=en&fs=true

                          (Persevere beyond the opening few minutes – it’s worth it)

                          Here’s a not so little links list that Film Studies For Free has been concocting for tanto tempo… It’s a collection of mostly academic, and all great quality, studies of the work of American filmmaker Martin Scorsese, one of the most utterly beloved of all directors among Film Studies undergraduates. And with Afterhours, Goodfellas and The Age of Innocence among this blog’s author’s favourite films, who is FSFF to disagree with such intensity?

                          Suggestions for any high-quality additions to this list would be most welcome.

                            >Christopher Nolan Studies

                            >

                            An image from Inception (Christopher Nolan, 2010)

                            Film Studies For Free knows only too well that there’s a time and a place for everything. Given that Christopher Nolan‘s Inception has just premiered to mostly great online acclaim, it is probably the right time and place for a bumper FSFF “Christopher Nolan Studies” entry (despite the fact that FSFF‘s author won’t actually see his new film till the weekend… No spoilers, people!).

                            Much more than all you need to know about the online discussion of Nolan’s latest film is linked to with customary wit and brevity by David Hudson. The below links, then, restrict themselves to online, openly accessible, and (pure-dead-brilliant) scholarly takes on Nolan’s film work, and related matters, to date.

                              >On Todd Haynes: Happy Independence Day!

                              >

                              Film Studies For Free is off on its annual holiday. 
                              Back in two weeks. Hasta entonces, lectores queridos

                              Richard Dyer, Professor of Film Studies at University of Warwick and author of White and The Matter of Images will join Todd Haynes to discuss issues raised by his work and the Hopper film programme at the Tate Modern, London, June 4, 2004.

                              In the first of a two-part interview, Reel Report speaks to maverick American director Todd Haynes about his latest movie I’m Not There, an unconventional rock biopic about the life of music legend Bob Dylan. Haynes talks about the challenges of telling Dylan’s story, casting the six very different actors who play Dylan, and how he plans to take on the Bush administration with his next project (December 7, 2007).

                              http://www.cnettv.co.uk/embed/10000148

                              In the second part of Reel Report’s two-part interview with Todd Haynes, director of I’m Not There, the rock biopic about the life of Bob Dylan, we talk more generally about aspects of his filmmaking. In particular we ask him about his unique way of story-telling, his approach to the concept of film genres and whether his sexuality has an effect on his ability to interpret characters (December 18, 2007).

                              On this very appropriate day, Film Studies For Free honours Todd Haynes, a true and truly wonderful American independent filmmaker, with links, above and below, to great videos and many freely accessible and high quality online studies of his work.
                              Haynes is a big favourite at this blog, and why wouldn’t he be as one of the most “cinema-studies literate” filmmakers working today. Here’s looking forward to his forthcoming reworking of that Film Studies classic Mildred Pierce
                               Cornell Cinema events May 6, 2008

                              >A monstrous talent: Blue Velvet Studies in Memory of Dennis Hopper

                              >

                              “Why are there people like Frank?”

                              “A truly Bad Bad Guy is not believable and impossible to connect with. That is unless your whole story world is twisted and strange in itself; Like Dennis Hopper’s truly Bad Bad Guy in David Lynch’s Blue Velvet.” Sune Liltop, ‘Good Guy / Bad Guy’,  P.O.V. No.28, 2009

                              “…the conflict between smoothness and pent-up rage that defines Hopper’s roles in films like David Lynch’s Blue Velvet [1986]Adrian Danks, “Nice ‘N’ Easy: Speaking Frankly about The Night We Called it a Day’, Senses of Cinema, Issue 28, 2003


                              As Film Studies For Free is sure all of its readers will have learned by now, American movie actor, director and artist Dennis Hopper died yesterday. Some remarkable tributes to him have appeared in the last weeks, few if any better than those by filmmaker-critic Matt Zoller Seitz (see his video essay here; and a further written tribute here). Since the news of his death was made public, David Hudson has been collecting a full list of online tributes to Dennis Hopper here.

                              For FSFF‘s author, while she has a big soft spot for The Hot Spot (1990) as well as Easy Rider (1969), two films directed by Hopper, his most memorable contribution to the cinema was, in her view, his performance as the raging psychopath Frank Booth in David Lynch‘s 1986 film Blue Velvet. So this masterful film forms the (usually main) subject of each of the notable resources linked to in the scholarly webliography offered up today.  

                              Rest in peace, Mr Hopper.


                                      http://books.google.com/books?id=0BTV6s4cc0UC&lpg=PA3&ots=zzWIasZdxH&dq=%22The%20Misleading%20Man%3A%20Dennis%20Hopper%22%20MArtin&pg=PA3&output=embed

                                      >"Mix-Tape Cinema": studies of Wes Anderson’s films

                                      >

                                      Links added May 27, 2010
                                      Fantastic Mr. Fox: Wes Anderson at the New York Public Library (Fora.tv)

                                      On the occasion of today’s publication by Fora.tv of the above entertaining and informative video, Film Studies For Free presents a (rather) small but (almost) perfectly formed compendium of links to freely accessible studies of the joyous/poignant/whimsical/arch/’scavenger’ films of US writer/director Wes Anderson. As usual, if readers know of any other good online material to add to the below list, do please get in touch.

                                      http://www.movingimagesource.us/flash/mediaplayer.swf?id=10/764

                                      The Substance of Style, Pt 1Wes Anderson and his pantheon of heroes (Schulz, Welles, Truffaut) by Matt Zoller Seitz  posted March 30, 2009 

                                      The above video is the first in a five-part series of video essays analyzing the key influences on Wes Anderson’s style. Part 2 covers Martin Scorsese, Richard Lester, and Mike Nichols. Part 3 covers Hal Ashby. Part 4 covers J.D. Salinger. Part 5 is an annotated version of the prologue to The Royal Tenenbaums.

                                      ‘The Films of Wes Anderson’ (great clip ‘mix-tape’/montage) by Paul Proulx

                                      “A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, I watched a film called Bottle Rocket. I knew nothing about it, and the movie really took me by surprise. Here was a picture without a trace of cynicism, that obviously grew out of its director’s affection for his characters in particular and for people in general. A rarity. And the central idea of the film is so delicate, so human: A group of young guys think that their lives have to be filled with risk and danger in order to be real. They don’t know that it’s okay simply to be who they are.” Martin Scorsese, ‘Wes Anderson’, Esquire, March 1, 2000

                                      “Whenever I am getting ready to make a movie I look at other movies I love in order to answer the same recurring question: How is this done, again? I can never seem to remember, and I don’t mean that to be glib. I also hope people don’t throw it back in my face. Making a movie is very complicated, and it seems like kind of a miracle when it actually works out. Hal Ashby made five or six great movies in a row, and that seems to be practically unheard of.” ‘Wes Anderson on [Hal Ashby‘s] The Last Detail’ in ‘The Director’s Director’, by Jennifer Wachtel, GOOD, June 18, 2008

                                      “In narrative, whimsy emphasizes the unexpected links that connect disparate ideas or events, but the connections must be meaningful. Richard Linklater’s Slacker (1991) is not whimsical because it never proposes that the links between its scenes are anything more than incidental. It embraces insignificance and ponders the possibility of elevating apathy into anarchy. Wes Anderson’s films are whimsical because their unexpected juxtapositions are imbued with sentimental significance. As a visual mode, whimsy favours busy frames and compositions that distract viewers from the centre. It rewards those willing to explore the edges with jokes buried in marginalia or Dalmatian mice sniffing around in the corner of an elaborately composed shot. In all cases whimsy values the ability to appreciate the aesthetic harmony possible among myriad incongruent objects. It draws attention to the act of perception and the sensibility of the perceiver.” Charlotte Taylor, ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’, Frieze Magazine, Issue 92, June-August 2005

                                      ‘…[S]tuff like Wes Anderson mix-tape cinema…’, Michael Sicinski, ‘Songs Sung Blue: The Films of Michael Robinson’, Cinema-scope, 33 

                                      >Film-Historia: Index to English language articles

                                      >

                                      Over the years, Film Studies For Free has noticed that there were some excellent English-language articles on lots of different aspects of film history to be found at the (very difficult to navigate) website of the excellent Universitat de Barcelona-based film journal Film-Historia
                                      Until today, however, there was no easy way to access all of these articles, but …  (drum roll) … ta-da! Cast your eyes at the awesome list of direct links below, and, if you feel so inclined, thank your lucky stars that FSFF‘s author needed some distraction from her country’s general election shenanigans this morning.

                                      >Paranormal cinematic activity: ghost film studies

                                      >

                                      Latest update: April 27, 2010

                                       Publicity still for The Innocents (Jack Clayton, 1961). See an excerpt from this film in Nicolas Rapold and Matt Zoller Seitz‘s L Magazine video essay ‘Bad Seeds: Creepy Kids on Film’, embedded towards the foot of this entry

                                      Film Studies For Free has gone and spooked itself, today, with its own scary persistence in compiling a list of links to openly accessible, online, scholarly articles, chapters and theses on international ghost film studies. Oh, and there are two related video essays lurking at the bottom to scare the scholarly bejesus out of you for good measure, too (added April 27) .
                                      Like all the best posts at this blog (IOHO), the list below owes its hefty materiality to its connections with FSFF‘s author‘s own (hauntological) research, some of which, hopefully, will be directly shared with her fearless readers very shortly. So do please be a revenant, won’t you?